![]() Not to mention, you also get screen sharing and custom background features with Microsoft Teams similar to Zoom so that is awesome. And since you are subscribed to Microsoft Teams, you get other perks like unlimited chat, 2GB of cloud storage for each member, and 10GB of shared storage, real-time collaboration using the Office web apps, and more. Further, the participant limit is 20, in comparison to Zoom’s paltry 3 users so that is great. There is no time limit and you can continue your web meeting for as long as you want. However, keep in mind, Google Meet does not offer video recording either locally or through the cloud under the free plan.Īs far as the free offering is concerned, Microsoft Teams has hit it out of the park with its free version of Microsoft Teams. Other than that, Google Meet also has a 100 participant limit under the free tier and supports features like live caption, screen sharing, gallery view, and more. Basically, you can attend a video meeting without any time restrictions and that makes it better than Zoom as far as the free plan is concerned. However, this 60-min time limit will not be applied until September 30 so that is awesome. You can’t hold a web meeting for more than 60 minutes in a day– no matter if you have two or more participants. However, there are some restrictions that you should know under the free plan. Now, anyone can freely create web meetings and join one without paying a dime. Previously, Google Meet was part of the G Suite package, but in April, Google brought Meet to the general masses. You can learn more about the best Zoom features from the linked article. What I love more about Zoom is that you get all the essential features like HD video, screen sharing, virtual background, encryption, and more under the free plan. Further, you can locally record the video meeting and can save on your computer without paying any charge. Apart from that, you can add up to 100 participants in a Zoom meeting, but again the duration is capped at 40 minutes. However, if you are having a one-on-one meeting then there is no time limit. Starting with Zoom, you get a 40-minute time limit per day if you have three or more participants (including the host) in a meeting. So here we will discuss the free offerings offered by Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams and compare them side by side. And now every other video conferencing platform is offering a free tier including Microsoft Teams which was earlier a strictly paid-only service. The major reason Zoom found early success among both enterprises and general consumers goes primarily to its free plan offering. Nevertheless, at its current form, Microsoft Teams is not the best in terms of UI when pitted against Zoom and Google Meet. Only after the crazy success of Zoom, Microsoft merged Skype for Business with Teams to offer video meeting solution on its platform. Part of the reason why Microsoft Teams feels disjointed is that earlier it was a workspace for team collaboration through instant messaging - basically a Slack competitor. Sure, it’s brimming with features, but it would take you some time before you can find the option and start or join a video meeting. Moving to Microsoft Team, well, in my testing, I found it quite unfriendly. And similar to Zoom, Google Meet has also brought the popular Gallery view (called Tiled layout on Google Meet), but as of now, it only supports up to 16 users. You can also change the layout from the 3-dot menu. Further, on the meeting window, you have basic controls like Captions and Screen Sharing. On its dashboard, you are presented with only two options: either to join or start a meeting. In fact, many would consider it a barebone app, but that is part of its design approach to keep the UI as clean as possible. Coming to Google Meet, it’s second only to Zoom in terms of simplicity. Next, you can display up to 50 participants in a tiled-gallery view which is amazing. First off, creating or joining a meeting is just a click away. It has a simple and straight-forward interface despite being packed with the most advanced features. In terms of User Interface, I find Zoom to be the most user-friendly video conferencing app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |